Unraveling the Truth: Hasan Minhaj’s Response to The New Yorker’s Claims

In the world of comedy, Hasan Minhaj has made a significant mark with his distinctive style and thought-provoking humor. However, his reputation recently faced a severe test when The New Yorker published a critical article titled “Hasan Minhaj’s ‘Emotional Truths’.” In a 21-minute video response, Minhaj addresses the allegations and provides his side of the story.

A Personal Rebuttal

In his video, Hasan Minhaj sits at a desk, addressing the camera with a level of candor that is rare. He acknowledges that the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict might overshadow this issue, but he underscores the gravity of the situation. Accusations of fake racism are not to be taken lightly, and he feels compelled to offer an explanation.

Minhaj’s video is an attempt to clarify the doubts that may have arisen after reading The New Yorker’s article. The central question he aims to answer is whether he is a con artist who exploits fake racism and Islamophobia to further his career.

The New Yorker’s Stance

The New Yorker, on the other hand, stands by its story, asserting that Minhaj selectively presents information to make a point, which aligns with their reporting. They emphasize that their article was meticulously researched and fact-checked, drawing from interviews with over 20 individuals, including former staff from “Patriot Act” and “The Daily Show.” Their report also incorporates perspectives from people who have been subjects of Minhaj’s stand-up work.

High Stakes

The stakes are undeniably high for Hasan Minhaj. He was reportedly a front runner for the permanent host of “The Daily Show” before The New Yorker’s article surfaced. While it has been reported that he will not be getting the job, the broader concern is about his reputation.

Bill Maher, a fellow comedian who has faced accusations of Islamophobia, delivered a critique on his show, “Real Time with Bill Maher,” suggesting that Minhaj’s stories are entirely fabricated.

Key Points from Minhaj’s Video

Minhaj addresses several key points in his video response:

  1. The article implies that race was not a factor in his high school prom rejection. He presents emails and text messages between himself and the white classmate in question to support his claim that he was not “needlessly cruel” in recounting the story.
  2. His stand-up special, “Homecoming King,” features a pivotal moment where he was dumped the night of his senior prom due to his race. While The New Yorker’s article acknowledges the timing of the rejection, it suggests different understandings of the incident. Minhaj stands by his assertion that he was rejected because of his race.
  3. The article claims that he “shrugged off her concerns” about her identity being discovered, and that their friendship was strained. Minhaj presents friendly texts and emails from her and explains that he uses the pseudonym “Bethany” on stage to protect her anonymity.
  4. Minhaj admits to altercations with undercover law enforcement in his past, although he doesn’t provide extensive details.
  5. In his comedy special, “The King’s Jester,” Minhaj alleges that Craig Monteilh, a real-life FBI informant, infiltrated the mosque his family frequented under the name “Brother Eric.” The New Yorker reported Monteilh’s denial of any involvement with Minhaj but acknowledged that Minhaj included this segment in his show.

In his new video, Minhaj aims to communicate his personal experiences and apologize for contributing to a climate where false stories about police misconduct can overshadow legitimate concerns.


Hasan Minhaj’s response to The New Yorker’s article is a passionate defense of his character and the authenticity of his stories. It highlights the complexities of storytelling in comedy and the challenges comedians face when their personal narratives are scrutinized. As the dust settles, it remains to be seen how this controversy will impact Minhaj’s career.

Leave a Comment